Latin America Research Seminar (LARS)
About LARS
Research is the lifeblood of academia, just as evidence and analysis are the basis for sound policy decisions. Georgetown faculty, visiting researchers and fellows, and doctoral students whose work focuses on Latin America and the Caribbean engage in fascinating inquiry on an array of topics, in myriad contexts, using a diverse set of research methods. The CLAS Latin America Research Seminar (LARS) offers an opportunity for those scholars to share their research so that our community can learn about, celebrate, and promote their work.
LARS meets several times each semester, on Wednesdays, from 12:30-1:30pm. Lunch is served. Please see the schedule below for details.
Participation in LARS
We encourage Georgetown faculty, visiting researchers and fellows, and doctoral students whose work focuses on Latin America and the Caribbean to capitalize on this opportunity to share, and get multi-disciplinary feedback on, their research.
If you are interested in presenting your ongoing or recently completed research in LARS, please email Diana Kapiszewski (dk784@georgetown.edu) indicating (1) the month in which you would like to present; (2) the topic of your presentation.
With regard to attending LARS, sessions are open to the entire university community, and to the public.
LARS Presenter Guidelines
Presenters do not need to distribute anything written in advance, and there is no dedicated discussant. Instead, LARS sessions are structured in the following way:
- For the first 20 minutes, presenters discuss their research, offering answers to four guiding questions:
- What is the research project / focus / question?
- What data collection methods and data analysis methods do you use and why and how?
- What are your findings / results — what are you teaching us?
- What are the BIG-PICTURE issues that your work takes on – why does it matter?
- For the last 30 minutes, we open the floor for Q&A
Upcoming Seminars
Click below for more information about each presenter and their research.
Patricia Biermayr-Jenzano, Adjunct Professor, Science, Technology and International Affairs; Women and Gender Studies Program; Center for Latin American Studies
BSFS senior Maria Nunes
Women’s Participation in the Flower Industry in LAC: Global Significance and Complexity
Wednesday, March 26, 2025, 12:30-1:30pm, ICC 450
Abstract: The floriculture industry is a vital component of Latin Americas economy, particularly in Colombia and Ecuador, where it significantly contributes to national GDP and employment. This sector, dominated by the cultivation and export of roses, chrysanthemums, and other flowers, faces complex challenges, including environmental impacts, labor issues, and gender inequality. Despite these challenges, technological advancements and global market integration have propelled the industry’s growth. This paper explores the intricate supply chains, highlights the socio-economic contributions, and discusses the urgent need for sustainable and equitable practices in the Latin American flower industry.
Bios: Patricia Biermayr-Jenzano is a social scientist specializing in gender, food security and food systems transformation. She holds a Doctorate in Agriculture and Social Anthropology and a Master of Science in Agricultural Extension both from Cornell University in New York, and an Agricultural Engineering degree from Buenos Aires, Argentina. She has conducted post graduate studies in rural extension in Germany (DSE) and Israel (CINADCO). Her work has deep roots in participatory research, as well as incorporating the gender perspective into agriculture and environmental conservation efforts. She has served as the Gender Coordinator for the International Finance Corporation (IFC) projects in Latin America, as the leader of the Participatory Research and Gender Analysis Program at the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) in Cali, Colombia. She has performed as an evaluator for the World Bank, the United Nations Agriculture Organization (FAO), the International Development Research Center (IDRC) of Canada and the International Food Policy Institute (IFPRI) and as an advisor of the European Union on food systems transformation. Patricia has adopted a deep understanding of the need to embrace gender equality and inclusion (GEI) through her work in more than 20 countries in Africa, Southeast Asia and mainly in Latin America. She is currently a Senior Academic Advisor for the Global Development Studies Program, the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown and shares her passion on gender work with students at the Women’s Studies Program and the Center for Latin America Studies (CLAS) in Washington DC. She is an Argentine-US citizen and lives with her family in Northern Virginia.
Maria Nunes is a senior at Georgetown’s School of Foreign Service, majoring in International Economics, with a minor in Computer Science and a Certificate in International Business Diplomacy. Born and raised in Brazil, Maria is very interested in the economic and social aspects that shape Latin American countries. She has been conducting research on Value Chains of various commodities across the region alongside Professor Patricia Biermayr-Jenzano and the Center for Latin American Studies since 2022. She enjoys studying women’s participation and their economic empowerment along with socioeconomic implications for the region. Previous Research: Women participation in the Soybean Value Chain in Brazil, Livestock in Argentina and tropical fruits across regions (LAC and Africa).
Ana Paula Pellegrino, PhD Candidate, Department of Government
The Warrior’s Paradox: the Rise of Parapolice Groups in Rio de Janeiro
Wednesday, April 2, 2025, 12:30-1:30pm, ICC 450
Abstract: Why do police officers form armed groups? This paper argues that when entrepreneurially-minded officers can capitalize on mandates to use violence to combat armed actors, they will develop illicit enterprises. They will pursue this strategy when the police force does not promote discipline and the institutional controls over police behavior are weak, reducing their fear of being punished. I call this process the “warrior’s paradox,” whereby investing in state violence to combat criminal groups generates a new type of criminal group, a parapolice group (PPG). I use formal Bayesian process tracing to test this theory in a case study of PPGs formed in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in the 1990s-2000s. I adjudicate between my theory and an alternative explanation, delegation, which explains paramilitary and militia formation. I find that PPG formation in Rio de Janeiro was the result of a logic of violent entrepreneurship, encouraged by politicians and police leaders.
Bio: Ana Paula Pellegrino is a Ph.D. Candidate at the Department of Government at Georgetown University. A Brazilian national, she holds a BA and an MA in International Relations and an MA in Data Science from the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio). She combines quantitative and qualitative data and methods to study criminal and political violence, with a particular interest in Latin America. Her research agenda includes projects on state and non-state armed actors, including police and criminal groups; micro-dynamics of violence; as well as war outcomes. In addition to support from Georgetown University, her research is supported by Fundação Estudar’s Leaders program, the Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation’s Emerging Scholars program, the US Institute of Peace and Minerva Research Initiative’s Peace Scholar Fellowship. Outside of academia, Ana Paula has worked in Brazilian civil society organizations conducting research and advocacy, developing technology and spearheading philanthropic strategies in organizations such as the Igarapé Institute, ImpulsoGov and the República Institute. She also organizes the Violence, Instability and Peace Workshop, a feedback-focused virtual seminar series established in 2022.
ProPELAC Student Research Showcase
Wednesday, April 9, 2025, 12:30-1:30pm, ICC 450
Gabriel Farfán Mares, Adjunct Professor, Center for Latin American Studies
Building Global Policy Inferences for Alcoholic Beverages Harmful Consumption: A Cluster Analysis & Machine Learning Approach
Wednesday, April 30, 2025, 12:30-1:30pm, ICC 450
Abstract: A sizeable number of individuals consume alcohol for leisure, yet in some countries and regions this phenomenon leads to a harmful pattern which has a direct impact on people’s health, their surroundings, health systems, and, ultimately, obligate governments to tackle its negative impacts.
This paper tries to understand the ecosystem in which such consumption takes place by differentiating types of beverages (fermented and distilled). Harmful alcohol consumption is associated with the preferred type of beverages rather than alcoholic beverages or pure alcohol consumption in general. Since we believe that policy dimensions are key and governments, along with other organizations, have the mandate and obligation to tackle harmful alcohol consumption, we use countries as the basis of the unit of analysis.
This research furthers a novel way to understand the environment in which harmful consumption of alcohol around the world is embedded in. Differentiation refers to beverage strength (in terms of pure alcohol content) and their gender impact (female and male consumption). We use a variety of health data and indicators to incorporate the health dimension and social impact in our model as well (disorders and road injuries). We cluster or group countries by their preferred type of beverage, gender, age, health and social indicators and thus place countries by their probability, or likelihood, to belong to a cluster. This analysis aims to find affinities, generate identities, assemble associations, and open new spaces to rethink global policies. We aim to provide harmful alcohol consumption phenomenon’s stakeholders with global policy guidelines.
Bio: He began his career in the public administration of Mexico in 1996 and has held positions at all 3 levels of government: municipal, state and federal, starting as an analyst and ending as Head of Unit at the Mexican Ministry of Finance (SHCP). His doctoral thesis analyzes the financial relationship between the federal government of Mexico and Petróleos Mexicanos (London School of Economics or LSE, in England) and he has published a large number of articles in the press, notably in the newspaper El Economista, Reforma, and magazines. specialized and academic organizations such as Expansión and Foro Internacional, among others. Since 1998, he has been an undergraduate and graduate professor at Mexican and foreign institutions, teaching courses on various aspects of fiscal policy in a comparative perspective.
Previous Seminars
Varun Biddanda, PhD Candidate, Department of Spanish and Portuguese
Bollywood in Lima: A Case Study
Wednesday, October 9, 12:30-1:30pm, ICC 302-P
Bio: Varun is a fourth-year Ph.D. student in the Department of Spanish and Portuguese. He obtained his Bachelor’s degree from Cornell University, double majoring in Biological Sciences and Spanish. After teaching English for two years in the Basque Country, he entered Georgetown’s doctoral program in Hispanic Literature and Cultural Studies. He has taught Spanish, English, and Basque as well as Hispanic Cinema. His areas of interest include Discard Studies, Parallel Cinema, and minority language education and preservation. When he has spare time, he enjoys playing the viola and running along the Potomac.
Abstract: My primary question of investigation seeks to explore the reception and circulation of Indian commercial films, an industry known popularly as “Bollywood,” in Lima, Peru from the 1970s to the 1980s. During these two decades, Bollywood films were widely shown in Lima’s movie theaters, with two theaters in particular almost exclusively showing Bollywood films. In this sense, Lima constituted one of Latin America’s first entry points for Indian commercial cinema. I also investigate how cinematic texts of Indian origin were made legible, and marketable, to a Peruvian audience. This talk will concentrate on the evolution of movie posters for important Bollywood films shown in Lima. My archival process involved examining issues of El Comercio, Lima’s most long-standing and widely read newspaper, to map out what films were being shown and where. I also consulted items at the Museo de Arte Contemporaneo de Lima library. In addition to archival research, my project led me to insightful conversations with several individuals. I spoke with Indian cinema owners and film distributors in Lima as well as people from the Indian Embassy to Peru and Bolivia. I aim to show how Bollywood, through its disproportionate popularity with Lima’s working class and its alterity to Europe, exemplifies my developing concept of an alternative cosmopolitanism. This ongoing project will form a chapter of my dissertation, in which I examine the connections between Peru and India as part of a broader South-South dialogue.
Marília Ferreira, J.W. Fulbright Ruth Cardoso Chair, Center for Latin American Studies
Language and Culture in Gavião-Jê Onomastics
Wednesday, October 23, 2024, 12:30-1:30pm, ICC 450
Bio: Marília Ferreira is a Full Professor at Federal University of Pará and Research Fellow with Brazil’s National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). From 2024-2025, she is the Ruth Cardoso Chair in CLAS, Georgetown University, in DC.
Abstract: Onomastic studies in general—and the studies of the onomastic systems of indigenous languages in particular -require interdisciplinary investigations that address properly the diversity inherent in the field. Thispresentation will discusses how linguistic concepts dialogue with anthropology and ethnography in the study of the onomastic system of Gavião-Jê, an indigenous language spoken by people who live in sotheast of Pará, in Brazil. We will discuss aspects observed in the description of the anthroponyms known and used by native speakers of that traditional language. The methodology includes fieldtrips for data collection, ethnographic documentation, data analysis in presence of the Gavião-Jê language speakers and data archiving in a digital database.
L Angulo Amaya, PhD Candidate, Department of Spanish and Portuguese
Artivismo Transduccionista en Colombia: Inmersión de la Agencia Cuir
Wednesday, November 6, 2024, 12:30-1:30pm, ICC 450
Bio: Transfeminist researcher (they /them) interested in Latin American cuirism. L Angulo Amaya is a PhD student in Spanish Literature and Cultural Studies at Georgetown with a Master’s degree in Literature from the Universidad de los Andes. Their research focuses on transfeminist anti-racist artivism and the metaphor of the monster in Colombia, where they were born and raised. They’ve been working non-stop as a Spanish teacher since 2018, first at Universidad de los Andes and now at Georgetown University. With a commitment to Disability Justice, their ethic is one of community care, rest, and work boundaries. L enjoys doing embroidery and everything related to Halloween.
Abstract: Desde canciones hasta literatura, talleres y películas, el colectivo afrocolombiano Las Raras se apropia del espacio y el tiempo, en cuanto a sus calles, su virtualidad, sus memorias y presentes, resignificando el papel de las diversidades y las tradiciones regionales. Esta ponencia entiende que el uso de transmedia en el activismo, ejemplificado con el grupo Las Raras (productor de música, películas, fanzines y talleres), funciona como un no-lugar crítico que atraviesa a los cuerpos como una transducción háptica, lo que refuerza, voluntaria o involuntariamente, su calidad de protesta cuir frente a la realidad colombiana. Es decir, su uso de transmedia, entendido como agencia política por su contenido y su relación con la comunidad, trabaja directamente con la redefinición de espacio, creando así un colectivo cultural interdisciplinario para pensar críticamente la realidad de los derechos TLGBIQA+ en Colombia con mayor cercanía a la primera persona, lo que aumenta su relevancia como grupo críticamente político. Desde la teoría transfeminista sobre los medios culturales como espacios políticos, propongo un análisis del colectivo para comprender el espacio que toma en pro del activismo colombiano en el contexto de posguerra, con un fin de memoria y reparación. Primero, revisaré Las Raras como medio cultural. Después, me adentraré en su contexto de origen y los mensajes que transmite. Para finalizar, presentaré su agencia política como material de historización e inclusión de subjetividades.
ProPELAC Student Research Showcase
Wednesday, December 4, 2024, 12:30-1:30pm, McGhee Library
Amanda Robles López
“Trade and Investment Priorities of Costa Rica”
MSFS ’24
Bio: Amanda, raised in a single-parent household in Puerto Rico, is a passionate advocate for low-income communities and minority inclusion in politics. At 17, she designed a bill for auditive street lights and spoke in the Puerto Rican Senate for LGBTQ+ rights. Her experience includes assisting asylum seekers as a bilingual intern at Human Rights First, mentoring first-generation and low-income students, and volunteering with AmeriCorps VISTA to combat COVID-19 in Puerto Rico. She served as a youth delegate at the UN’s U.S. Youth Consultation for Climate Strategy, addressing disaster preparedness. Amanda holds a bachelor’s in politics from Catholic University and a Master of Science in Foreign Service from Georgetown University, where she focused on international development and humanitarian emergencies. She led Georgetown’s Decolonizing International Affairs Club and interned at the Minority Business Development Agency, working to boost minority business competitiveness. Amanda aims to strengthen Puerto Rico’s economic resilience to natural disasters.
Peter Clanton
“Explaining the Divergence between Perceptions of China in Paraguay and Economic Engagement”
CLAS ’25
Bio: Peter is a second year candidate at Georgetown University’s Center for Latin American studies. Peter graduated from Wake Forest University in 2022 with a degree in Politics and International Affairs. During his undergraduate studies, Peter interned with the Department of State and the Perry Center for Hemispheric Studies. Peter currently works for a cybersecurity and business risk firm. Peter is passionate about Chinese investment in Latin America, as well as other Asia-LATAM cultural, economic, diplomatic, and diaspora-related connections.
Lucia Gonzalez Camelo
“Transitioning to Empowerment – Guyana’s Journey with the Private Sector in Oil Extraction Production”
CLAS ’25
Bio: Lucia is a first-year candidate in Latin American Studies. She was born and raised in Bogotá, Colombia, and she graduated in May 2023 from Universidad de Los Andes with a degree in Political Science with an International Relations concentration. During her undergraduate, she interned at the Embassy of Colombia in Switzerland. Also, Lucia was a research assistant in a Policy Paper for the Friedrich Naumann Foundation on technology-related issues in the Andean countries. As well, Lucia conducted investigations on security and intelligence-related topics. In 2022, she was also the head of responsibility for the model U.N. team at her university, where she helped with fundraising for a Colombian NGO in the Pacific.
Lucia is passionate about foreign policy, diplomacy, peace processes, security, and democracy. She aspires to work in an international organization where she can work on Latin American topics, especially raising awareness on important issues for her home country, Colombia.
Grace Fay
“Argentina’s Bilateral Currency Swap with China—Why the Swap Line Matters in Milei’s Argentina”
CERES ’25
Bio: Grace Fay is originally from Attleboro, Massachusetts, but spent the last two years working as a Litigation Paralegal at Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP in New York City. Grace graduated with a BSFS from Georgetown in 2021, where she majored in International History, minored in Russian Language and earned a Certificate in Diplomatic Studies. At CERES, Grace hopes to study the history and development of law in Russia to better understand the attitude towards law and justice in Russian society today.
Osmel Manzano, Adjunct Professor, Center for Latin American Studies
What do we know about the Social License to Operate in the Andean Region?
Wednesday, January 8, 2025, 12:30-1:30pm, ICC 450
Bio: Osmel Manzano is Regional Economic Advisor for the Country Department for the Andean Countries at the Inter-American Development Bank (IADB), and Adjunct Professor at the Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University. He is responsible for the research agenda and macroeconomic monitoring of the IADB in the Andean region. He has been working on the development challenges in the region, with emphasis on natural resources, energy, growth and productivity. Hehas authored different publications on these subjects. Previously he was the Regional Economic Advisor for the Country Department for Belize, Central America, Haiti, Mexico, Panama and Dominican Republic.
Before joining the IADB, he was Assistant Director, and Coordinator of the Research Program at the Development Bank of Latin America (CAF). He was also Visiting Adjunct Professor at George Washington University and Adjunct Professor at Universidad Catolica Andres Bello, the McCourt School of Public Policy at Georgetown University and IESA Business School -in Venezuela, and has been invited to teach at different Latin American universities. He was a Visiting Fellow at the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government of the John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. He holds a Ph.D. Degree in Economics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Abstract: The Andean region (Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela) is on both sides of the energy transition. On one hand, all these countries produce fossil fuels, ranging from coal to natural gas. On the other hand, they possess an important resource base of critical minerals, including copper, which are essential for green technologies. Therefore, the region could leverage this duality to foster development and avoid the negative consequences that decarbonization could pose to it. Nevertheless, this will require important transformations that range from geographical issues to institutional frameworks. In this context, the relationship between society and the mining sector has proven to be particularly complex. The Andean region has one of the highest rates of conflicts related to mining. This research project agenda looks at different experiments done to understand what drives the Social License to Operate.I finds that there are deep-seated issues of both distributive and procedural justice. While many citizens do state that mining and oil and gas are good for their country, granting an implicit license to the sector, they also express a feeling of being unheard by these companies and that they are not receiving a fair share of the rents. Regarding distributive justice, the conflict appears to stem not from differences between constituencies, but rather from the relationship between firms and the government. Procedural justice is equally crucial, as environmental concerns and community relations play a key role in these dynamics. Communities desire firms that genuinely prioritize environmental sustainability and fulfill their tax obligations.
Laia Balcells, Professor, Department of Government
Legitimacy and Public Support for Peace Settlements with Armed Groups
Wednesday, January 29, 2025, 12:30-1:30pm, ICC 450
Bio: Laia Balcells (Yale PhD ’10) is a Professor of Government at Georgetown University. Her research focuses on the causes and consequences of political violence and repression, transitional justice, nationalism, and ethnic conflict. Her first book, Rivalry and Revenge: The Politics of Violence during Civil War, was published by Cambridge University Press in 2017 and translated into Spanish by ICIP/Edicions Bellaterra in 2021. She has published over thirty-five articles in peer-reviewed journals, and her work has received multiple awards. Her research has been supported by the Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation, the Folke Bernadotte Academy, and others.
Abstract: What makes the public see armed groups as acceptable partners for peace instead of targets of law enforcement or military action? We examine legitimacy as an important but underexplored factor in determining when the public accepts peace negotiations with an armed group and on what settlement terms. We unpack legitimacy into motivational, material and moral dimensions, which shape public perceptions through compliance with the social contract, institutional recognition, and ethical appraisal. A group’s legitimacy is informed by different characteristics and behaviors. We test this argument in a conjoint experiment embedded in a unique online survey of 1,950 respondents in Colombia. The findings will help inform public attitudes to negotiations with armed actors, which can help create a more accepted peace.
Maggie Dunlap, PhD Candidate, Department of Spanish and Portuguese
Shared Tragedies, Divergent Narratives: The Literary Legacies of the Boate Kiss and República Cromañón Fires
Wednesday, February 5, 2025, 12:30-1:30pm, ICC 450
Bio: Maggie Dunlap is a Ph.D. student of Literature and Cultural Studies in the Spanish and Portuguese Department at Georgetown University. She received a B.A. in Political Science from Sewanee: The University of the South and an M.A. in Spanish from Middlebury College, with the distinction of “Mejor estudiante graduada.” Her academic interests include affect theory, contemporary Latin American fiction and nonfiction, and the role of narrative in articulating lived experiences of violence. Her dissertation proposal, “The Discourse of Disaster: Nonfiction Literatures of Catastrophe in Contemporary Latin America,” is a comparison of Argentine and Brazilian narrative nonfiction portraying urban crises like nightclub fires and nuclear contamination events.
Abstract: In the early morning of January 27th, 2013, over two hundred and thirty people lost their lives in a fire at the Kiss nightclub in Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Almost a decade earlier at the República Cromañón in Buenos Aires, Argentina, a strikingly similar tragedy claimed almost two hundred victims when fireworks were also ignited inside an overcrowded nightclub. Both the “Tragédia de Santa Maria,” as it would come to be known, and the Cromañón tragedy had enduring consequences for the families and communities of the victims, the survivors, and their respective nations at large. A comparative analysis of two nonfiction novels dealing with these disasters–Daniela Arbex’s Todo dia a mesma noite: a história não contada da Boate Kiss (2018) and Camila Fabbri’s El día que apagaron la luz (2019)–illuminates both shared narrative strategies and significant differences in the way these events are represented. Though Fabbri’s use of anaphora and the trope of the suffering mother echo Arbex’s emotional style in Todo dia, Fabbri’s deeply personal connection to the Cromañón fire and the very real trauma of that experience is rendered in a multitude of styles, voices, opinions, and tones. Therefore, while Arbex’s narrative is rooted in the belief that a nation is not merely a collective that suffers tragedy together, but one that feels tragedy together, Fabbri’s portrayal of catastrophic violence resists any such totalizing conclusion. Drawing on the ideas of Sara Ahmed and Lauren Berlant, I argue that Arbex’s literary-adjacent style seeks to connect Brazilian readers to the reality of the Boate Kiss fire, and more importantly, make them feel responsible for its aftermath through the affective experiences of compassion and shame. Fabbri’s narrative, on the other hand, responds to Ignacio Sánchez Prado’s concern for the “narrative mediation of violence” through its kaleidoscopic portrayal of the fire and its aftermath. Through this comparative analysis, I begin to show how disaster is produced discursively in the contemporary period.
Tiago Ventura, Assistant Professor, McCourt School of Public Policy
Misinformation Exposure Beyond Traditional Feeds: Evidence from WhatsApp Deactivation Experiments in the Global South
Wednesday, February 12, 2025, 12:30-1:30pm, ICC 450
Bio: I am an Assistant Professor in Computational Social Science at Georgetown University’s McCourt School of Public Policy and a faculty affiliated with the Massive Data Institute. Before joining Georgetown, I was a Postdoctoral Fellow at NYU’s Center for Social Media and Politics. I received my Ph.D. in Political Science from the University of Maryland, College Park, where I am still a faculty member affiliated with the iLCSS and worked as a misinformation researcher at @Twitter.
Abstract: In most advanced democracies, concerns about the spread of misinformation are most often associated with feed-based social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook, and these platforms also account for the vast majority of research on the topic. However, in most of the world, particularly in Global South countries, misinformation often reaches citizens through social media messaging apps, particularly WhatsApp. In this presentation, I will discuss a set of WhatsApp Deactivation Field Experiments incentivizing participants to either (1) reduce exposure to multimedia content on WhatsApp or (2) limit overall WhatsApp usage to up to 10 minutes per day. These experiments were deployed ahead of general elections in three major Global South countries: Brazil, India, and South Africa. Across the three cases, our intervention significantly reduced participants’ exposure to false rumors circulating widely online and to overall political news. However, these changes in the informational environment did not significantly change belief accuracy. Results for changes in polarization are minimal, and restricted to ethnic-based prejudice in India when participants reduced their overall WhatsApp usage. At the end of the presentation, I will briefly mention ongoing efforts to collect WhatsApp data through a data donation pipeline.
Erick Langer, Professor, Department of History and School of Foreign Service
Concubines, Lawyers, Cattle and Maps: The Struggle of the Guarani for Autonomy in Cordillera Province in Bolivia, 1825-1930
Wednesday, March 12, 2025, 12:30-1:30pm, ICC 450
Abstract: What happens when indigenous groups use the legislation designed to take away their land to preserve it instead? This was the case with the Guarani communities in the Andean foothills and the Gran Chaco in the mid-nineteenth to early twentieth centuries. They designed a number of strategies that permitted them to maintain their lands while integrating into Bolivian society, to a large extent on their terms. This presentation is based on the microhistory of the region that Prof. Langer is writing as a book that calls into question our understandings of indigenous-settler relations in the Western Hemisphere.
Bio: Dr. Langer is Professor of History in the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. He has taught at Georgetown University since 1999. His main research interests include the economic history of Latin America, frontiers and missions, and indigenous movements. Dr. Langer has written, edited, or co-written eight books and over fifty scholarly articles. Dr. Langer was Director of the Center for Latin American Studies at Georgetown from 2009 to 2013. He was awarded academic multiple awards, including four Fulbright Research and Lecturing Awards, two Social Science Research Council Awards, two National Endowment for Humanities Research Awards, as well as the Orden “Universidad Central de Venezuela.” He was elected Honorary Member of the Academia Boliviana de Historia in 2016.